Man: Hey excuse me -- that's the new Kindle, isn't it, $79.
Woman: Best way to read, even in sunlight.
Great work, stop it right here. The commercial should be over at the 10 second mark. The Kindle is an awesome eReader. It does this one thing better than any other machine. Amazon differentiated itself, made its point clearly, and now they can call it a day.
Or, they can ruin the commercial....
Man: Yeah but I mean if you want to watch movies or surf the web.
Woman: I've got a Kindle Fire for that (looks a hundred feet away to a different Amazon tablet product being used by her children.)
"PUNT!" This has got to be one of the few examples in advertising where a company just throws its hands in the air, curses the heavens and says, "We give up." To have your only rebuttal be "No, but we make something else that does that" is just sad.
No one is going to carry around two devices. "This one's for readin', and this one's for videoin'." The woman's response should be that the regular Kindle isn't trying to be all things to all people -- it does one thing (displays text), and it does it well. It's for readers. End of story.
Man: Three Kindles. That's gotta be expensive.
Woman: Not really. Together, they're still less than that (points to Man's iPad.)
Yeah, fine, the iPad 2, at $499, is expensive. It's also far and away the top tablet on the market. But I can find a 16GB iPad for less than the $477 combined price of those three Amazon products. And I know this is a store return, but I still find it funny that the first one I found was on Amazon.
Man: Someone sitting here?
Woman: My husband.
Man: Yeah...
And a weird, anticlimactic ending to boot. Was there really enough sexual tension between these two that the audience had to see how the interaction ultimately ended? And judging by the man's resignation, he appears to be jealous of the unseen man's wife simply because this family owns three Kindles. So peculiar.
Amazon, this is not the way to go after Apple. You make fine, lower-cost products, and there's a market for that. But you don't make iPads -- and expecting people to haul around two tablet devices instead of buying an iPad is laughably dumb. So stick with your strategy -- and don't bring up Apple unless you actually have a claim to make.
Do you think this guy always starts conversations like that?
ReplyDelete"I notice you're chewing gum - that's Big Red, isn't it? 79 cents?"
But yeah, this commercial makes no sense. What might have made sense was a Kindle Fire commercial that points out the price difference. Comparing the Kindle itself to the iPad is thoroughly pointless.
I would never use a Kindle.
ReplyDelete"But I can find a 16GB iPad for less than the $477 combined price of those three Amazon products."
ReplyDeleteKindle Fire: $199
Kindle Touch: $99
Kindle: $79
Don't you mean $377?
The Kindle Touch wasn't mentioned in that ad, Anonymous. We're left to assume that both of the kids have their own Kindle Fires. Thus 199+199+79 = $477.
ReplyDeleteHahahah I like the "unnecessary bikinis" tag.
ReplyDeleteI can only assume they did it because she was in a bikini in the previous ad and they must have got so many comments about how HOT!!1! she is.
This is horrible, but the Kindle Fire ad that really irks me is the one where Amazon leaves the box (with the name clearly all over it) on the lady's doorstep in the middle of a busy street (in plan view).
ReplyDeleteThe fact that no one stole the damn thing despite knowing what it is says a lot.
This is horrible, but the Kindle Fire ad that really irks me is the one where Amazon leaves the box (with the name clearly all over it) on the lady's doorstep in the middle of a busy street (in plan view).
ReplyDeleteThe fact that no one stole the damn thing despite knowing what it is says a lot.